Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 03:24
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Bond Yields Keeping Climbing. Governments Can Bring Them Down. - Barron's
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Molly Jong-Fast on Human Frailty and Unlearning Erica Jong’s Lessons - Literary Hub
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Your Unique Breathing Patterns May Reveal Your Identity and Mental Health - Neuroscience News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
China’s tighter export controls squeeze wider range of rare earths - Financial Times
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Knicks’ coaching change could bring them everything they’re chasing - New York Post
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
New study finds strong link between hearing loss and dementia - WKRC
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.